Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 63

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $1,099,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2020
1Vincent P ConfredaWarwick, RI 02888$130,401
2Jglr IncorporatedExeter, RI 02822$111,320
3Clark Farms IncCharlestown, RI 02813$60,144
4Margaret E HutchisonSaunderstown, RI 02874$58,172
5The Greene CompanyGreene, RI 02827$48,600
6David W CarpenterWakefield, RI 02879$47,112
7East Beach Farms LLCSouth Kingstown, RI 02879$43,979
8Shellfish For You, LLCWesterly, RI 02891$42,514
9East Beach Oyster Company LLCWakefield, RI 02879$40,612
10Pleasant Acres Nursery IncWesterly, RI 02891$40,126
11Walrus And Carpenter Oysters, LLCProvidence, RI 02909$38,875
12Wicked Tulips LLCBradford, RI 02808$28,891
13Cedar Island Oyster CoSaunderstown, RI 02874$23,841
14Greenview Farm LLCWakefield, RI 02879$23,680
15Behan Family Farms, LLCAshaway, RI 02804$23,593
16Real Food Ri, LLCNarragansett, RI 02882$23,350
17Little River Farm LLCExeter, RI 02822$22,896
18Confreda Gardens IncCoventry, RI 02816$22,149
19Patrick McniffEast Greenwich, RI 02818$21,466
20David K Roebuck IIWakefield, RI 02879$20,255

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag