Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 720
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $21,908,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $2,324,065 |
2 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $799,096 |
3 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $668,081 |
4 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $538,262 |
5 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $480,582 |
6 | Frank & Cheryle Rogers | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $417,836 |
7 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $343,293 |
8 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $334,207 |
9 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $329,972 |
10 | Drew Farms | Mullins, SC 29574 | $287,511 |
11 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $287,184 |
12 | Richard & Jane Rogers Farm | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $283,852 |
13 | Alan Gray Burroughs | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $266,048 |
14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $253,227 |
15 | First Citizens Bank ** | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $233,487 |
16 | Oneal Planting Co | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $233,140 |
17 | Bryant Farms Inc | Dillon, SC 29536 | $180,185 |
18 | Michael G Gibson | Marion, SC 29571 | $167,690 |
19 | Kayson T Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $163,427 |
20 | Little Pee Dee Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $163,167 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>