SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='TX10' AND progcode='total_dp ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Total Direct Payments in 10th District of Texas (Rep. Michael McCaul), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,513

Recipients of Total Direct Payments from farms in 10th District of Texas (Rep. Michael McCaul) totaled $116,793,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Direct Payments
1995-2020
1Ocho Farms *Brookshire, TX 77423$3,210,223
2Engstrom Bros *Garwood, TX 77442$2,512,177
3Dollins Farms Partnership *Katy, TX 77492$2,182,758
4Miles And Welch Partnership *Katy, TX 77492$1,683,176
5Franz Farms II Partnership *Katy, TX 77492$1,665,979
6Wiese Brothers *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$1,547,770
7Minze Agriculture Partnership *Katy, TX 77492$1,471,884
8Triple A Farming Co *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$1,439,978
9Cook Farms A Joint Venture *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$1,320,529
10Ely Farms *Brookshire, TX 77423$1,141,428
11Pederson Brothers Rice Farms *Brookshire, TX 77423$1,085,507
12Fossil Farms *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$1,061,551
13Beckendorff Farms-joint Venture *Sealy, TX 77474$1,025,510
14Wintermann 2003 Joa *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$982,297
15Lehrer Affiliates *Garwood, TX 77442$973,753
1652 Farms *Garwood, TX 77442$944,693
17Countyline Farms J V *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$912,630
18Man Farming Company J V *Eagle Lake, TX 77434$891,335
19R L Kohleffel Farms *East Bernard, TX 77435$883,047
20Thomas A Smaistrla Jv *Sealy, TX 77474$863,942

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag