Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 397

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $3,174,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
1John W QuinnBrady, TX 76825$173,737
2W C WilliamsMertzon, TX 76941$140,222
3Gary L McgeheeMertzon, TX 76941$85,177
4Joe H JohnsonBrady, TX 76825$83,585
5Schlinke Dry Creek Ranch LpSan Angelo, TX 76901$61,073
6Steve StephensSan Angelo, TX 76904$59,738
7Charles D Clark JrBrady, TX 76825$50,000
8J W RanchesMertzon, TX 76941$49,334
9Fay M Hildebrand EstSterling City, TX 76951$48,660
10Bill M TullosSan Angelo, TX 76901$46,666
11Trail Ranch Zappe DivPaint Rock, TX 76866$39,605
12Horizon FarmsSan Angelo, TX 76905$39,000
13H H & Sue LinthicumBarnhart, TX 76930$38,206
14Douglas John WildeSan Angelo, TX 76905$37,494
15Elta Joyce McafeeSan Angelo, TX 76904$36,120
16John & Betty Jo Wilde JvSan Angelo, TX 76905$34,782
17M D Bryant Family TrustSan Angelo, TX 76902$34,768
18Gloria B LittleEmory, TX 75440$34,228
19Dove Creek PartnershipHouston, TX 77057$33,402
20Post Revocable TrustAndrews, TX 79714$30,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag