Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Utah
(Rep. Chris Stewart)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,278
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $26,856,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $518,623 |
| 2 | Baker Ranches Inc | Baker, NV 89311 | $341,065 |
| 3 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $284,566 |
| 4 | Triple C Farms L L C | Holden, UT 84636 | $270,957 |
| 5 | Frank Vincent Family Ranch Operations, LLC | Leamington, UT 84638 | $246,574 |
| 6 | Rudger C Atkin Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $242,901 |
| 7 | Heaton Livestock Co | Alton, UT 84710 | $242,853 |
| 8 | Wintch Livestock Company | Manti, UT 84642 | $242,379 |
| 9 | Gurney Cattle Company LLC | Aurora, UT 84620 | $239,586 |
| 10 | Roberts Dairy Inc | Beaver, UT 84713 | $237,019 |
| 11 | Pearsons Ranch | Minersville, UT 84752 | $234,351 |
| 12 | Spencer M Butler | Leamington, UT 84638 | $216,665 |
| 13 | Wood Bros | Lyman, UT 84749 | $206,165 |
| 14 | Clark And Shirley Bradshaw Family Lmtd Ptnr | Beaver, UT 84713 | $205,939 |
| 15 | Finlinson Land & Livestock LLC | Oak City, UT 84649 | $194,502 |
| 16 | Rodney Carter | Minersville, UT 84752 | $192,665 |
| 17 | Heaton Cattle Company LLC | Saint George, UT 84791 | $192,081 |
| 18 | Gubler Ranch LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $187,013 |
| 19 | Michael Yardley Farms LLC | Milford, UT 84751 | $179,877 |
| 20 | Titmus Family Farms LLC | Grantsville, UT 84029 | $179,007 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf