Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Virginia
(Rep. Robert Wittman)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 567
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $17,692,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $873,807 |
| 2 | Ingleside Plantation Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $587,657 |
| 3 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $461,523 |
| 4 | B & S Farms Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $266,176 |
| 5 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $261,758 |
| 6 | Eagle Tree Farm Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $256,433 |
| 7 | Haile Farm LLC | Dunnsville, VA 22454 | $255,820 |
| 8 | Welch Farms Inc | Kilmarnock, VA 22482 | $250,959 |
| 9 | Little Wicomico Oyster Company Ll | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $222,133 |
| 10 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $219,781 |
| 11 | Benjamin B Ellis Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $218,019 |
| 12 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $215,590 |
| 13 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $211,439 |
| 14 | Robert B Gillions & Son LLC | Hague, VA 22469 | $208,662 |
| 15 | Ridgefield Farms LLC | Lancaster, VA 22503 | $206,433 |
| 16 | Rappahannock River Oysters LLC | Topping, VA 23169 | $199,457 |
| 17 | Kent Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $196,601 |
| 18 | Haynie Farms LLC | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $181,871 |
| 19 | Louis Fairfax Chandler | Montross, VA 22520 | $178,616 |
| 20 | Fairview Farms Inc | Kinsale, VA 22488 | $172,584 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf