Total Subsidies in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,276

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $195,427,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Cloverfield EnterprisesChamplain, VA 22438$4,120,577
2Agri-landCenter Cross, VA 22437$3,757,484
3Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,938,786
4James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,652,241
5Herbert Wilkerson & Son IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$2,470,139
6Harris Farms IncHeathsville, VA 22473$2,252,816
7Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$2,109,012
8Welch Farms IncKilmarnock, VA 22482$1,975,548
9W H Bray & Sons IncorporatedUrbanna, VA 23175$1,956,513
10Benjamin B Ellis IncChamplain, VA 22438$1,878,424
11Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,854,589
12J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$1,846,401
13David A Hudnall SrHeathsville, VA 22473$1,834,937
14Sanford Farms IncTappahannock, VA 22560$1,711,480
15Fairview Farms IncKinsale, VA 22488$1,664,965
16C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,607,827
17Bearcroft Farms IncLottsburg, VA 22511$1,561,173
18Brooks Farm LLCTappahannock, VA 22560$1,542,756
19Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,530,053
20Haynie Farms LLCHeathsville, VA 22473$1,515,912

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag