Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,571

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $163,106,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Cloverfield EnterprisesChamplain, VA 22438$3,651,846
2Agri-landCenter Cross, VA 22437$3,390,400
3Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,533,070
4James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,231,091
5Harris Farms IncHeathsville, VA 22473$2,171,475
6Herbert Wilkerson & Son IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$2,152,648
7Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$1,945,695
8W H Bray & Sons IncorporatedUrbanna, VA 23175$1,881,361
9Welch Farms IncKilmarnock, VA 22482$1,827,240
10David A Hudnall SrHeathsville, VA 22473$1,770,381
11Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,759,856
12J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$1,650,797
13Benjamin B Ellis IncChamplain, VA 22438$1,624,020
14Fairview Farms IncKinsale, VA 22488$1,578,907
15Sanford Farms IncTappahannock, VA 22560$1,568,044
16Bearcroft Farms IncLottsburg, VA 22511$1,458,587
17Brooks Farm LLCTappahannock, VA 22560$1,375,058
18C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,371,236
19Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,353,213
20S E Thomas & Sons LpCaret, VA 22436$1,340,362

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag