Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,574
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $163,372,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $3,651,846 |
2 | Agri-land | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $3,390,400 |
3 | Philip Minor Farms | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,533,070 |
4 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,231,091 |
5 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $2,171,475 |
6 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $2,152,648 |
7 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $1,945,695 |
8 | W H Bray & Sons Incorporated | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $1,881,361 |
9 | Welch Farms Inc | Kilmarnock, VA 22482 | $1,827,240 |
10 | David A Hudnall Sr | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $1,770,381 |
11 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,759,856 |
12 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $1,650,797 |
13 | Benjamin B Ellis Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $1,624,020 |
14 | Fairview Farms Inc | Kinsale, VA 22488 | $1,578,907 |
15 | Sanford Farms Inc | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,568,044 |
16 | Bearcroft Farms Inc | Lottsburg, VA 22511 | $1,458,587 |
17 | Brooks Farm LLC | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,375,058 |
18 | C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, Dunk | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,371,236 |
19 | Richard M Schools Jr | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,353,213 |
20 | S E Thomas & Sons Lp | Caret, VA 22436 | $1,340,362 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>