Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 206
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $8,093,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beechland Farms II Partners | Surry, VA 23883 | $648,521 |
2 | A L Bailey Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $437,150 |
3 | Springhill Farms Partnership | Waverly, VA 23890 | $398,616 |
4 | Old Hickory Farms Inc | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $299,550 |
5 | Woodview Farms | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $294,601 |
6 | Five Ash Farm, LLC | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $267,901 |
7 | Hanzlik Farms Inc | Waverly, VA 23890 | $249,939 |
8 | Rogers Farms | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $238,751 |
9 | Jeffrey Allan Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $216,499 |
10 | Crystal Springs Farm LLC | Carson, VA 23830 | $200,646 |
11 | Cedar Point Farm | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $180,445 |
12 | J Wyatt Cox | Waverly, VA 23890 | $177,954 |
13 | Chestnut Farms LLC | Surry, VA 23883 | $164,251 |
14 | Lewis Farms, LLC | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $147,694 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $144,430 |
16 | Barnes Farms LLC | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $141,954 |
17 | Calvin W Clements | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $138,136 |
18 | J Milton Dunn | Yale, VA 23897 | $130,011 |
19 | The Bank Of Southside Virginia ** | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $124,909 |
20 | Nottoway Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $120,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>