Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Virginia
(Rep. Morgan Griffith)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,140
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Virginia (Rep. Morgan Griffith) totaled $2,395,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $166,742 |
| 2 | Chelsea Painter | Laurel Fork, VA 24352 | $117,250 |
| 3 | Kegley Farms Of Pulaski LLC | Pulaski, VA 24301 | $63,675 |
| 4 | Jeremy James Harmon | Galax, VA 24333 | $59,337 |
| 5 | Highland Dairy Farm | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $54,611 |
| 6 | Mountain Meadows Dairy Inc | Meadows Of Dan, VA 24120 | $50,648 |
| 7 | Donna Webb Ayers | Cana, VA 24317 | $50,434 |
| 8 | Steven T Mccroskey Dba Rivergate Farms | Mendota, VA 24270 | $46,061 |
| 9 | Countiss Dairy LLC | Abingdon, VA 24210 | $45,634 |
| 10 | Wolfpen Farm LLC | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $42,882 |
| 11 | Huffard Dairy Farms | Crockett, VA 24323 | $39,149 |
| 12 | Cresthaven Farms Inc | Galax, VA 24333 | $38,706 |
| 13 | Stuart Land & Cattle Co Of Virginia Inc | Rosedale, VA 24280 | $33,938 |
| 14 | Hillside Farm Inc | Dublin, VA 24084 | $30,492 |
| 15 | Richie L Farmer | Woodlawn, VA 24381 | $30,166 |
| 16 | Pageton Farms LLC | Sugar Grove, VA 24375 | $29,646 |
| 17 | Joseph Allen Osborne | Mouth Of Wilson, VA 24363 | $28,719 |
| 18 | Russell's Dairy | Woodlawn, VA 24381 | $28,350 |
| 19 | Alfred W Stephens | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $24,133 |
| 20 | Sidney S Fant | Independence, VA 24348 | $23,201 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf