Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Washington
(Rep. Dan Newhouse)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,035
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Washington (Rep. Dan Newhouse) totaled $331,054,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Duane Lathim | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,239,089 |
42 | Marilyn Van Hollebeke | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,237,333 |
43 | Anita Lathim | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,236,560 |
44 | Lon S Welch | Washington, UT 84780 | $1,234,892 |
45 | Azevedo & Sons Dairy 2 LLC | Othello, WA 99344 | $1,206,615 |
46 | Thompson Farms Inc | Hartline, WA 99135 | $1,203,650 |
47 | Nunamaker Farms | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $1,200,388 |
48 | Pierret Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,194,325 |
49 | Ronald Lee Loeber Estate | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,189,948 |
50 | Lynn & Karen Blair Jv | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,178,536 |
51 | Larry Hoffman Jr | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,159,162 |
52 | Hockett Ranch Corp | Brentwood, TN 37024 | $1,134,472 |
53 | Wiswall Ag Partnership | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,129,932 |
54 | C C & H Enterprises Inc | Connell, WA 99326 | $1,122,739 |
55 | Allan E Kleinbach | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $1,122,017 |
56 | L & L Farms Joint Venture | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,119,235 |
57 | Kelly & Rebecca Cochrane Joint Venture | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $1,118,169 |
58 | Hayden Farms Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,096,881 |
59 | Cooper Farms Inc | Mesa, WA 99343 | $1,087,451 |
60 | Kenneth Depue | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,069,330 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”