Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 642
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $10,395,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William Neuhaus | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $303,001 |
2 | Joseph Duffek | Waterford, WI 53185 | $223,426 |
3 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $193,956 |
4 | James Fonk | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $186,491 |
5 | Bernard Lavin | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $166,451 |
6 | Bernice Richter | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $161,615 |
7 | Timothy J Kumbier And Margaret M | Burlington, WI 53105 | $161,060 |
8 | Thomas Potisk | Franksville, WI 53126 | $156,619 |
9 | Edwin Grevers | Lake Forest, IL 60045 | $131,060 |
10 | Lloyd Nelson | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $120,546 |
11 | Howard Zabler | Burlington, WI 53105 | $116,436 |
12 | Mike Nelson | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $111,008 |
13 | Thomas Wood | Franklin, WI 53132 | $110,000 |
14 | Jeffry Sweet | Franksville, WI 53126 | $106,305 |
15 | Beck Trust | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $106,057 |
16 | Paul Naber | Burlington, WI 53105 | $103,971 |
17 | Art Naber Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $102,131 |
18 | Roger Christoph | Lake Forest, IL 60045 | $101,729 |
19 | Robert E Funk Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $93,659 |
20 | Century Oaks Farm LLC | Burlington, WI 53105 | $93,595 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>