Biomass Crop Assistance Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,121
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in the United States totaled $323,095,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cousineau Forest Products Inc | Henniker, NH 03242 | $5,344,567 |
2 | A Duda & Sons Inc | Oviedo, FL 32762 | $4,835,732 |
3 | Boardman Tree Farm LLC | Portland, OR 97201 | $4,168,148 |
4 | Old Durham Wood | Durham, CA 95938 | $3,168,113 |
5 | Canal Wood LLC | Conway, SC 29528 | $2,991,694 |
6 | Aloterra Farms LLC | Spring, TX 77381 | $2,984,342 |
7 | Cpt Logco LLC | Diboll, TX 75941 | $2,971,298 |
8 | Big B Sugar Corporation | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $2,946,619 |
9 | Prime Timber Company LLC | Bangor, ME 04401 | $2,924,207 |
10 | G & F Ag Service Inc | Ripon, CA 95366 | $2,737,071 |
11 | Plum Creek Marketing Inc | Crossett, AR 71635 | $2,473,433 |
12 | Wt Gardner & Sons Inc | Lincoln, ME 04457 | $2,438,490 |
13 | Wilson Ag | Shafter, CA 93263 | $2,369,148 |
14 | James B Libby | Lincoln, ME 04457 | $2,318,280 |
15 | Lionudakis Firewood Inc | Escalon, CA 95320 | $2,293,013 |
16 | Tubit Enterprises Inc | Burney, CA 96013 | $1,958,040 |
17 | Agra Trading LLC | Chico, CA 95973 | $1,899,878 |
18 | Wedgworth Farms Inc | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $1,866,119 |
19 | Clt Logging | Grenada, CA 96038 | $1,742,956 |
20 | The Chip Monks Inc | Fresno, CA 93723 | $1,696,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>