Grasslands Reserve Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,318
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $6,129,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lehfeldt Land & Livestock | Lavina, MT 59046 | $94,120 |
| 2 | Lois Hall Land Limited Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $81,555 |
| 3 | Drummond-foster Partners Ltd | Anson, TX 79501 | $76,974 |
| 4 | Mescalero Apache Tribe | Mescalero, NM 88340 | $62,035 |
| 5 | Schalla Rev Trust - Roger G. Schalla | Fowler, CO 81039 | $60,000 |
| 6 | 711 Ranch Limited Partnership | Kenansville, FL 34739 | $56,927 |
| 7 | Grouse Creek Livestock Association | Grouse Creek, UT 84313 | $50,000 |
| 8 | Mill Iron North Ltd | Wellington, TX 79095 | $50,000 |
| 9 | William C Schade | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $50,000 |
| 10 | Brown Ranch Lllp | Baker, MT 59313 | $50,000 |
| 11 | Uintah Basin Grazing LLC. | Altamont, UT 84001 | $50,000 |
| 12 | Linda H Lewis | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $49,998 |
| 13 | Mayer Legacy LLC | Guymon, OK 73942 | $49,997 |
| 14 | Mill Iron South Ltd | Dallas, TX 75225 | $49,500 |
| 15 | Bedortha Ranches Inc | Paulina, OR 97751 | $49,459 |
| 16 | Barthelmess Ranch Corp | Malta, MT 59538 | $47,449 |
| 17 | Hag Farm | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $47,216 |
| 18 | Michael W Harris | Lago Vista, TX 78645 | $46,748 |
| 19 | Kelsey Ranch Lp | Snelling, CA 95369 | $46,710 |
| 20 | Fagan Ranch Inc | Del Rio, TX 78840 | $44,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf