Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 218,204
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in the United States totaled $2,140,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R&g Fish, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $14,993,471 |
| 2 | Pratima Jester D/b/a Jester Bee Company | Mims, FL 32754 | $5,864,765 |
| 3 | Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical Fis | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $5,744,413 |
| 4 | Evergreen Honey Co Inc | Billerica, MA 01821 | $5,607,744 |
| 5 | Ekstrom Aquaculture LLC | El Campo, TX 77437 | $5,019,934 |
| 6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $4,557,699 |
| 7 | Mill Point Aquaculture | Sealevel, NC 28577 | $4,066,895 |
| 8 | Neal Cattle Company,llc | Purcell, OK 73080 | $4,028,268 |
| 9 | Gulf States Aquaculture LLC | Palacios, TX 77465 | $3,763,473 |
| 10 | Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %david | Plant City, FL 33565 | $3,710,017 |
| 11 | Mark Ryan Kubecka | Palacios, TX 77465 | $3,589,530 |
| 12 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $2,979,115 |
| 13 | St Martin Aquaculture Inc | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,761,333 |
| 14 | Imperial Tropicals | Lakeland, FL 33805 | $2,726,967 |
| 15 | Sunshine Honey Bees LLC | Lecompte, LA 71346 | $2,647,455 |
| 16 | Horace Bell | Deland, FL 32720 | $2,634,523 |
| 17 | Jrs Aquaculture Farm Inc | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,545,959 |
| 18 | Luella R Bell | Deland, FL 32720 | $2,460,732 |
| 19 | Urban Tropical Inc | Lakeland, FL 33810 | $2,377,157 |
| 20 | Absolute Honey LLC | Mylo, ND 58353 | $2,329,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
