Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 874
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Arizona totaled $120,493,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H Four Farms III | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,412,409 |
2 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,288,109 |
3 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $2,201,610 |
4 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $2,193,973 |
5 | Colorado River Indian Tribes Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,137,465 |
6 | A Tumbling T Ranches | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $1,800,918 |
7 | Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Fmit Avi Kwa Ame Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $1,739,462 |
8 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $1,554,111 |
9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,537,767 |
10 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $1,494,384 |
11 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $1,269,807 |
12 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $1,185,193 |
13 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $1,098,377 |
14 | Flying R Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,070,761 |
15 | Salt River Farming | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,032,105 |
16 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,029,698 |
17 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $1,021,241 |
18 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $1,020,628 |
19 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,016,598 |
20 | Fox Butte Growers | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $1,008,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>