Total Commodity Programs in Gila County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $878,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John L Johnson | Young, AZ 85554 | $69,021 |
2 | Lyman Ranches Limited | Payson, AZ 85541 | $49,787 |
3 | M-lazy-s Cattle Company Inc | Young, AZ 85554 | $45,225 |
4 | M Bar K Cattle Co LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $36,036 |
5 | George T Cline Equity Trust | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $31,713 |
6 | Destry Alan Haught | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $31,705 |
7 | Lori L Brown | Payson, AZ 85541 | $31,130 |
8 | Radium Cattle Co LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $30,972 |
9 | Ash Creek Grazing Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $28,593 |
10 | D G Fenn Land & Cattle Co LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85022 | $25,410 |
11 | Walnut Creek Ventures LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $25,014 |
12 | Anchor Seven Livestock Associatio | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $24,750 |
13 | Hughes Trading Co LLC | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $23,628 |
14 | Point Of Pines Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $23,589 |
15 | Erickson Family Trust | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $23,364 |
16 | J-4 Ranch Inc. | Payson, AZ 85541 | $22,803 |
17 | The Bar X LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $22,099 |
18 | White Mountain Apache Tribe | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $22,007 |
19 | James M Weidenbener | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $21,681 |
20 | Griffin Cattle Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $20,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>