Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 306

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $1,781,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Lane FarmsEudora, AR 71640$51,734
2Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott PtrLake Village, AR 71653$49,972
3Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$48,263
4Raymond L And Louise G Pieroni Farm PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$41,288
5Paul And Kathy Dunavant General PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$39,266
6Hensley FarmsEudora, AR 71640$37,922
7B & R FarmsGreenville, MS 38701$37,562
8Epstein Land CoLake Village, AR 71653$37,306
9Vincent And Betty S Pieroni FarmLake Village, AR 71653$32,520
10Cash Bilberry FarmLake Village, AR 71653$32,515
11B Pieroni FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$32,416
12Keith's Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$30,712
13Claude And Diane Grubbs FarmsEudora, AR 71640$30,633
14Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint VentureLake Providence, LA 71254$30,451
15Third Arm FarmsEudora, AR 71640$29,299
16Joey Pamplin Farm PtrshpLake Village, AR 71653$28,757
17Joe Mencer Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$28,447
18B & J PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$28,286
19Charles Poole FarmsEudora, AR 71640$27,967
20Lake Hall Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$25,171

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag