Market Gains in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 479
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $18,097,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $1,587,745 |
2 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,025,310 |
3 | Epstein Land Co | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $615,573 |
4 | Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott Ptr | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $549,848 |
5 | Keller Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $413,601 |
6 | Mencer Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $375,662 |
7 | E And E Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $374,360 |
8 | Ashton General Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $336,134 |
9 | B & B Mencer Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $297,284 |
10 | Wayne Wilkison Farms II | Wynne, AR 72396 | $284,612 |
11 | Bennett And Son | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $271,612 |
12 | Will Grubbs | Eudora, AR 71640 | $268,034 |
13 | Kimberly Grubbs | Eudora, AR 71640 | $266,865 |
14 | B Pieroni Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $240,159 |
15 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $219,482 |
16 | Sal Ranch Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $199,937 |
17 | Keith's Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $197,518 |
18 | Selby Farms Inc | Montrose, AR 71658 | $193,861 |
19 | Myers Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $177,042 |
20 | Lane Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $176,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>