Conservation Reserve Program in Pulaski County, Arkansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pulaski County, Arkansas totaled $170,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jack Tyler Family LLC | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $18,806 |
2 | Craig Planting Co Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $18,610 |
3 | Estate Of Mary L Ratcliffe | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $17,285 |
4 | Ronnie Walderns | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $15,708 |
5 | James & Jill Averitt Family Trust | Scott, AR 72142 | $14,997 |
6 | Elizabeth T Dougan | North Little Rock, AR 72117 | $10,191 |
7 | Michael L Parker | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $8,434 |
8 | Jimmy B Sims | Scott, AR 72142 | $7,978 |
9 | Robert Horton | England, AR 72046 | $6,751 |
10 | Dorothy Myers Farms | Cabot, AR 72023 | $5,862 |
11 | Rem Bayou LLC | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $4,894 |
12 | Rolling Hills Farms | Little Rock, AR 72223 | $3,540 |
13 | Smith Family Farm | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $3,535 |
14 | Westbrook Farms LLC | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $2,864 |
15 | John Walter Fleming | Bryant, AR 72022 | $2,814 |
16 | Emily S Dickinson | Little Rock, AR 72210 | $2,814 |
17 | Coleman & Sarah Westbrook Joint Revocable Trust | North Little Rock, AR 72117 | $2,742 |
18 | George West | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $2,682 |
19 | Ann Hall Robinson Revocable Trust | Novato, CA 94947 | $2,243 |
20 | Fletcher Farm | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $2,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>