Total Conservation Programs in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,977
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in California totaled $181,235,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kistler Santo Domingo Ranches Inc | Jamestown, CA 95327 | $2,115,700 |
2 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $2,049,888 |
3 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,013,921 |
4 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $1,750,262 |
5 | Clark Brothers | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,710,960 |
6 | K W Ranch | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,558,151 |
7 | Sierra Land & Sheep LLC | Gardnerville, NV 89410 | $1,464,488 |
8 | Bitterwater Land & Cattle | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,409,134 |
9 | D-y Ranch General Partnership | Montague, CA 96064 | $1,359,750 |
10 | Townley Bros | Montague, CA 96064 | $1,297,705 |
11 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $1,276,341 |
12 | Roy H Richards Jr | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,204,743 |
13 | Ronald Hodel | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $1,084,659 |
14 | Petersen Estate Co | Dixon, CA 95620 | $1,055,272 |
15 | Diane Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $981,337 |
16 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $980,865 |
17 | Durst Home Ranch LLC | Capay, CA 95607 | $938,030 |
18 | Chuck York | Montague, CA 96064 | $932,632 |
19 | P B M Farms | Dorris, CA 96023 | $910,179 |
20 | Michael W Orahood | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $907,792 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>