Total Commodity Programs in Monterey County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $123,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William R Barbree | King City, CA 93930 | $14,488 |
| 2 | Work Ranch LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,720 |
| 3 | Miller Brothers Cattle Inc | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,460 |
| 4 | Peter J Vogel | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $8,951 |
| 5 | The Anthony L. Lombardo Separate | Salinas, CA 93902 | $7,081 |
| 6 | Nessen Schmidt | King City, CA 93930 | $5,826 |
| 7 | Larry Homen | King City, CA 93930 | $5,814 |
| 8 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $5,496 |
| 9 | John M Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $5,002 |
| 10 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $4,763 |
| 11 | John P Madson | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $4,681 |
| 12 | Douglas H Thomason | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $4,130 |
| 13 | Kenneth Eade | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $4,025 |
| 14 | Pierre Camsuzou | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,559 |
| 15 | Timothy Hearne | King City, CA 93930 | $3,183 |
| 16 | The Rodgers Peaslee Family Trust | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $2,947 |
| 17 | Robin L Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $2,781 |
| 18 | Demaree Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $2,664 |
| 19 | John Moore | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,581 |
| 20 | W J Van Boxtel | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf