Total Commodity Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 138
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $832,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $143,730 |
2 | Michael Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $55,196 |
3 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $55,057 |
4 | Johansing Farms LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $36,320 |
5 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $35,918 |
6 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $30,821 |
7 | Junis Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $27,899 |
8 | Lonnie Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $27,899 |
9 | Cal Poly Corporation | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | $25,412 |
10 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $25,404 |
11 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $22,313 |
12 | Charlie Kuhnle III | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $20,462 |
13 | Christopher Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $15,769 |
14 | Donald O Cavalletto | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $14,833 |
15 | Robert K Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $14,769 |
16 | Miller Moth LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $14,132 |
17 | Wilson Ranches Inc | Templeton, CA 93465 | $13,187 |
18 | Cagliero Ranches Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $12,445 |
19 | T Mcgourty Enterprises LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $11,410 |
20 | Ronald Hodel | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $9,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>