Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Larimer County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Larimer County, Colorado totaled $151,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bees Inc | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $24,845 |
2 | Roberts Cattle Company LLC | Livermore, CO 80536 | $18,767 |
3 | David P Lamb | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $17,960 |
4 | Ackerman Land & Livestock | Wellington, CO 80549 | $16,240 |
5 | Johnson And Sons Llp | Loveland, CO 80537 | $13,334 |
6 | John I Boxberger | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $11,294 |
7 | Swanson Farm & Ranch Co | Wellington, CO 80549 | $10,000 |
8 | George E Seidel Jr Trust | Laporte, CO 80535 | $5,172 |
9 | Dirk Banks | Loveland, CO 80537 | $4,632 |
10 | Kraft Farms Inc | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $3,500 |
11 | D Scott Read | Loveland, CO 80537 | $3,500 |
12 | K & M Company Lllp | Fort Collins, CO 80522 | $3,400 |
13 | Peterson Bros | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $3,227 |
14 | Kerbs Brothers Farms Inc | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $2,748 |
15 | Steve Shirley | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $2,153 |
16 | Harry Hilderman Trust | Wellington, CO 80549 | $2,064 |
17 | Edward J Lempka | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $1,932 |
18 | Ruth J Wagner-haake | Wellington, CO 80549 | $1,895 |
19 | Leland Asa | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $1,344 |
20 | Eugene Miksch | Loveland, CO 80538 | $972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>