Counter Cyclical Program in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 180
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $2,485,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wayne Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $413,479 |
2 | J W Moseley Joint Venture | Lake City, FL 32024 | $323,358 |
3 | Inge Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $205,745 |
4 | James Hunter Ketcham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $197,041 |
5 | Tifanie Moseley Miller | Lake City, FL 32024 | $171,587 |
6 | Charlie H Crawford | Lake City, FL 32024 | $132,810 |
7 | Michael Roberts | Lake City, FL 32024 | $123,092 |
8 | C-m-s Trust | Fort White, FL 32038 | $114,199 |
9 | I C Terry Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $99,009 |
10 | Russell Wilson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $93,531 |
11 | George C Moseley Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $91,348 |
12 | R Lamar Moseley | Fort White, FL 32038 | $53,425 |
13 | Harry Moseley | Lake City, FL 32056 | $40,612 |
14 | Billy Cason | Fort White, FL 32038 | $26,978 |
15 | Cloree W Bailey | Fort White, FL 32038 | $26,936 |
16 | Robert L Moseley Jr | Old Town, FL 32680 | $25,363 |
17 | Simon Watson Sr Estate | Fort White, FL 32038 | $25,329 |
18 | Nathaniel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $22,701 |
19 | Hazel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $20,133 |
20 | Donald W Graham | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $20,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>