Market Loss Assistance Program in Twin Falls County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,637
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Twin Falls County, Idaho totaled $11,760,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Driscoll Brothers | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $232,576 |
| 2 | Brown Bros | Buhl, ID 83316 | $179,238 |
| 3 | Maurice Eckert & Sons Inc | Buhl, ID 83316 | $139,888 |
| 4 | Tri Harder Farms Inc | Buhl, ID 83316 | $139,888 |
| 5 | Salmon Falls Land And Livestock Co Inc | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $137,090 |
| 6 | Darrell M Funk | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $129,786 |
| 7 | Patricia Funk | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $119,803 |
| 8 | W T Williams Inc | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $114,308 |
| 9 | Griff Farms | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $113,830 |
| 10 | Daniel Cummins | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $108,131 |
| 11 | Carla Cummins | Murtaugh, ID 83344 | $106,003 |
| 12 | Fortune Thoroughbred Farms Inc | Pocatello, ID 83202 | $104,487 |
| 13 | E & J Cattle Inc | Castleford, ID 83321 | $101,183 |
| 14 | Michael L Larson | Highland, UT 84003 | $91,497 |
| 15 | Beth Larson | American Fork, UT 84003 | $91,497 |
| 16 | L Ray Stanger Sons Llp | Hansen, ID 83334 | $91,276 |
| 17 | Magic Irrigators Inc | Buhl, ID 83316 | $86,018 |
| 18 | Rgb Farms | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $83,928 |
| 19 | Bell Rapids Mutual Irrigation Co | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $74,097 |
| 20 | David L Funk | Hansen, ID 83334 | $72,368 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf