Direct Payment Program in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 88,247
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Indiana totaled $2,415,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Crossroad Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $3,693,908 |
2 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $2,339,911 |
3 | Anson Family Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $2,191,201 |
4 | L S Farms Llp | Howe, IN 46746 | $1,762,920 |
5 | Remington Ag Partnership | Remington, IN 47977 | $1,661,526 |
6 | Likens Farms | Anderson, IN 46011 | $1,657,176 |
7 | Boyd Grain Farms | Washington, IN 47501 | $1,513,731 |
8 | Wright Farms | State Line, IN 47982 | $1,450,441 |
9 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $1,389,195 |
10 | Moon Island Farms Partnership | Lowell, IN 46356 | $1,385,102 |
11 | S & C Cornelius Farms | Switz City, IN 47465 | $1,222,159 |
12 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $1,209,736 |
13 | Seng Bros | Dubois, IN 47527 | $1,159,526 |
14 | Hawk Farms | Muncie, IN 47303 | $1,151,097 |
15 | Tom Farms Partners | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $1,147,881 |
16 | Demaree Farms Partnership | Jamestown, IN 46147 | $1,125,650 |
17 | Indy Family Farms | Greenwood, IN 46142 | $1,077,415 |
18 | Kline Family Farms Partnership | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $1,012,573 |
19 | Maple Pork Farms | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $1,009,502 |
20 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $996,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>