Direct Payment Program in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,321
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $29,138,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arnholt Brothers LLC | Columbus, IN 47203 | $680,325 |
2 | Gelfius Farms Inc | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $426,199 |
3 | Farm Operators Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $416,020 |
4 | K & G Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $414,920 |
5 | Dodd Farms | Hope, IN 47246 | $321,397 |
6 | G & R Burbrink Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $306,326 |
7 | Daniel Fiesbeck | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $279,322 |
8 | Richard S Tucker | Columbus, IN 47203 | $276,930 |
9 | Curtis Burbrink | Columbus, IN 47201 | $256,774 |
10 | David Fiesbeck | Edinburgh, IN 46124 | $248,078 |
11 | Jaquess Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $245,233 |
12 | Wehmeier Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $234,261 |
13 | Albert Suhre O'connor | Columbus, IN 47203 | $230,298 |
14 | Gregory Wayne Daily | Columbus, IN 47203 | $226,636 |
15 | Mark Fischer Inc | Columbus, IN 47201 | $225,636 |
16 | Marshall Middendorf | Columbus, IN 47201 | $223,566 |
17 | John P Baute | Hope, IN 47246 | $217,422 |
18 | Frank Henry Fiesbeck | Columbus, IN 47201 | $212,603 |
19 | Michelle Jeanne Daily | Columbus, IN 47203 | $208,717 |
20 | Carol Ann Daily | Hope, IN 47246 | $207,672 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>