Deficiency Payment in Decatur County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 591
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Decatur County, Indiana totaled $2,446,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | W Hunter Robbins | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $29,185 |
2 | T & A Farms Wrong Id Do Not Use | Westport, IN 47283 | $26,212 |
3 | Harold Wilson | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $24,774 |
4 | Robert L Pumphrey | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $23,542 |
5 | Corland Corp | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $23,472 |
6 | Decatur Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $23,244 |
7 | 4-way Production Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $21,720 |
8 | Black Acres Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $21,381 |
9 | Holtkamp Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $20,712 |
10 | Redelman Enterprises Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $19,054 |
11 | Behrwood Farms Inc | Kissimmee, FL 34746 | $18,842 |
12 | Greensburg Doles Bros Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,709 |
13 | Stewart Seeds Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,594 |
14 | Kenneth Owens | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,152 |
15 | Ricke Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,037 |
16 | B & J Krieger Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $18,025 |
17 | Curtis Hasselbring | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,578 |
18 | Miers Farm Corp | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,516 |
19 | Daniel E Wilson | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,298 |
20 | Corya Pork Farms Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $17,068 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>