Total Commodity Programs in Hancock County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 575
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hancock County, Indiana totaled $15,700,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hill Farms LLC | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $1,152,656 |
2 | Scott Farms Family Partnership | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $449,282 |
3 | Kyle Brune | Fountaintown, IN 46130 | $373,136 |
4 | Arthur Gilt Farms LLC | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $336,204 |
5 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $331,450 |
6 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $309,136 |
7 | B & M Farms Inc | Pendleton, IN 46064 | $239,158 |
8 | Carl D Smith | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $236,320 |
9 | Kristi M Smith | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $236,320 |
10 | Kingen Family Farms, LLC | Mccordsville, IN 46055 | $211,237 |
11 | Lantz & Corwin Farming General Partnership | New Palestine, IN 46163 | $208,146 |
12 | Phares Family Farms Inc | Mccordsville, IN 46055 | $189,435 |
13 | Wm Tim Cain | Wilkinson, IN 46186 | $186,972 |
14 | Merlau-cline Farms Inc | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $168,810 |
15 | Ssz Enterprises LLC | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $160,908 |
16 | Tim Hickerson | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $159,762 |
17 | Robert E Ellis | Fortville, IN 46040 | $157,853 |
18 | Joseph W Paxton | Fortville, IN 46040 | $154,931 |
19 | Mohr Farms Inc | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $153,420 |
20 | Blue River Family Farms LLC | New Palestine, IN 46163 | $151,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>