Deficiency Payment in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 407
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $999,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanley Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $21,423 |
2 | Thomas E Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $21,024 |
3 | James A Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,076 |
4 | Johnson Bros Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $19,897 |
5 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $18,585 |
6 | Larry A Meinika | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $17,951 |
7 | Hoffman Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $17,620 |
8 | Leon E Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $17,193 |
9 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $17,180 |
10 | Longville Farms Inc | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $16,694 |
11 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $15,918 |
12 | Dayne Wilkinson | Larwill, IN 46764 | $15,909 |
13 | Stetzel Farms Inactive | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $15,757 |
14 | Walter Trabert Sr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $14,863 |
15 | Wolf Brothers % Ken Wolf | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $14,588 |
16 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $13,459 |
17 | Guy G Deceased Wood | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $13,253 |
18 | Myers Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $11,703 |
19 | Lavern Schrader Incorrect | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $11,022 |
20 | Dwight A Stetzel | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $10,923 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>