Direct Payment Program in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,409
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $54,307,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jason John Woodring | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $407,328 |
2 | Cedar Ridge Farms Ptn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $378,319 |
3 | Edson Farms Inc | Ionia, IA 50645 | $356,651 |
4 | Gilbert Farms Corp | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $329,873 |
5 | Wesley Ltd | Charles City, IA 50616 | $319,646 |
6 | Schulz Farm Enterprises Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $315,619 |
7 | James Donald Eckenrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $312,310 |
8 | Tod William Elliott | Sumner, IA 50674 | $310,789 |
9 | Julie Ann Eckenrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $302,950 |
10 | Rex Allen Nolte | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $302,063 |
11 | Steven Bruce Wiley | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $294,841 |
12 | Randall Kent Boedeker | Lawler, IA 52154 | $289,723 |
13 | Charles Earl Speicher | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $284,506 |
14 | Jeffrey Leroy Larson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $282,282 |
15 | Christopher J Hoey | Lawler, IA 52154 | $276,857 |
16 | William Joseph Hoey | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $276,798 |
17 | David Ray Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $276,450 |
18 | Leon Andrew Zeien | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $266,330 |
19 | Kimberly Jo Blazek | Lawler, IA 52154 | $264,269 |
20 | Donald Patrick Blazek Jr | Lawler, IA 52154 | $264,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>