Counter Cyclical Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,176
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $13,268,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Snb Farm Partnership | Webster City, IA 50595 | $159,144 |
| 2 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $121,358 |
| 3 | Merlyn J Hegland | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $100,090 |
| 4 | Carol A Hegland | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $100,090 |
| 5 | Henderson Bros | Story City, IA 50248 | $99,128 |
| 6 | Hills Maple Crest Fms Ptn | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $93,290 |
| 7 | Groves Brothers Inc | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $84,801 |
| 8 | Blue Farms Ltd Ptshp | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $80,414 |
| 9 | Gourley Bros L C | Webster City, IA 50595 | $76,806 |
| 10 | Young & Sons Farm Inc | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $72,742 |
| 11 | Miriam Elaine Greenfield | Ames, IA 50010 | $72,216 |
| 12 | Lyle Duane Greenfield | Ames, IA 50010 | $72,216 |
| 13 | Van Diest Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $71,749 |
| 14 | Allen Anderson | Williams, IA 50271 | $69,860 |
| 15 | Doolittle Farms Ltd | Webster City, IA 50595 | $67,911 |
| 16 | Mr Kreg Jon Kantak | Webster City, IA 50595 | $65,215 |
| 17 | Berg Farms Inc | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $65,125 |
| 18 | Eric Doolittle | Williams, IA 50271 | $62,212 |
| 19 | R Circle C Inc | Woolstock, IA 50599 | $61,560 |
| 20 | Wayne Bernard Neuman | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $58,883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf