Production Flexibility Program in Henry County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,362
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $26,903,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mac Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $229,738 |
2 | Cml Farms Corp | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $220,412 |
3 | Ronald F Denning | New London, IA 52645 | $217,937 |
4 | Leon Paul Peterson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $206,131 |
5 | Allender Farms Ltd | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $200,553 |
6 | Kenneth Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $196,043 |
7 | Beulah Valley Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $195,670 |
8 | Remick Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $195,372 |
9 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $188,976 |
10 | Fitz Farms Ltd | New London, IA 52645 | $183,441 |
11 | Larry L Van Syoc | New London, IA 52645 | $183,033 |
12 | Dennis E Anderson | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $171,982 |
13 | Bi-county Reid Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $166,758 |
14 | Gabeline Trucking Corp | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $158,323 |
15 | Daniel R Gabeline | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $158,322 |
16 | Robert Gabeline | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $154,769 |
17 | G & F Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $150,275 |
18 | David L Gabeline | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $149,982 |
19 | Jerry J Ruschill | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $149,449 |
20 | Jeffrey Allen Rich | Wayland, IA 52654 | $147,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>