Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Tama County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 784
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Tama County, Iowa totaled $19,970,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | In-state Livestock Supply Inc | Tama, IA 52339 | $593,848 |
2 | Kaleb L Bidwell | Tama, IA 52339 | $250,000 |
3 | Dalton Doyle | Tama, IA 52339 | $237,886 |
4 | Timothy N Murty | Tama, IA 52339 | $231,856 |
5 | Cindy Bidwell | Tama, IA 52339 | $231,267 |
6 | K & S Farms | Gladbrook, IA 50635 | $175,910 |
7 | Double R Farms Inc | Toledo, IA 52342 | $175,049 |
8 | Paul B Nardini | Belle Plaine, IA 52208 | $155,427 |
9 | J D Mattingly Farms Inc | Toledo, IA 52342 | $154,823 |
10 | Calderwood Farm Inc | Traer, IA 50675 | $154,475 |
11 | Chris E Wilson | Dysart, IA 52224 | $147,716 |
12 | Kadyn Doyle | Tama, IA 52339 | $144,777 |
13 | Brian P Doyle | Tama, IA 52339 | $144,475 |
14 | Amy J Doyle | Tama, IA 52339 | $144,475 |
15 | Jesina Farms Inc | Toledo, IA 52342 | $143,858 |
16 | Mitchell Arnold Wieben | Clutier, IA 52217 | $142,988 |
17 | Kenneth L Bidwell | Tama, IA 52339 | $142,882 |
18 | Dan Nekola | Tama, IA 52339 | $141,909 |
19 | T C Q Farms Inc | Gilman, IA 50106 | $140,023 |
20 | Larry L And Jon R Winkelpleck Associates | Clutier, IA 52217 | $139,246 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>