Total Conservation Programs in Kansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91,288

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kansas totaled $3,177,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Bellamy Aerial Spraying JvGoodland, KS 67735$2,515,699
2Tim Dewey FarmsCimarron, KS 67835$2,322,404
3Clawson Land PartnershipPlains, KS 67869$1,993,048
4R & L FarmsGarden City, KS 67846$1,703,889
5Premier 4 Farms PartnershipHugoton, KS 67951$1,703,066
6B & B FarmsRichfield, KS 67953$1,683,292
7Herrmann Land & Cattle CoFord, KS 67842$1,377,753
8Kansas Univ Endow AssociationHutchinson, KS 67504$1,333,024
9Kickapoo Tribe Of KansasHorton, KS 66439$1,322,749
10Prairie Band Potawatomi NationMayetta, KS 66509$1,294,165
11Brown EnterprisesSublette, KS 67877$1,266,295
12Justin R KohlhorstGarden City, KS 67846$1,244,356
13Hatcher Cattle IncSyracuse, KS 67878$1,212,254
14Etling FarmsEnsign, KS 67841$1,198,274
15Finnup Foundation TrustGarden City, KS 67846$1,167,780
16Marlin Spreier - Spreier Rev TrustJetmore, KS 67854$1,140,755
17Linda D JacksonGuymon, OK 73942$1,132,294
18Carl E Kohlhorst IncSyracuse, KS 67878$1,120,832
19Dane G Hansen FoundationHutchinson, KS 67504$1,119,980
20Brent NashCimarron, KS 67835$1,107,666

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag