Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Graham County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 212
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Graham County, Kansas totaled $3,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Billips Farms | Hill City, KS 67642 | $192,755 |
2 | Terry Hobbs | Penokee, KS 67659 | $86,294 |
3 | Walt Farms Inc | Quinter, KS 67752 | $72,837 |
4 | Evan Schmidt Lesser | Palco, KS 67657 | $69,040 |
5 | Gail P Hofstetter | Hill City, KS 67642 | $61,247 |
6 | David Rohleder - The Rohleder Farms Trust | Morland, KS 67650 | $60,950 |
7 | Wade Ambrosier | Norton, KS 67654 | $59,565 |
8 | Paul J Haffner | Hoxie, KS 67740 | $56,699 |
9 | Richard Herman Farms Inc | Hill City, KS 67642 | $55,671 |
10 | Carl Davis | Hill City, KS 67642 | $53,943 |
11 | Kenneth W Windholz | Hill City, KS 67642 | $50,924 |
12 | Darien Fritts | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $48,705 |
13 | Donovan P Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $47,953 |
14 | Dana Tremblay | Penokee, KS 67659 | $44,314 |
15 | Troy Tremblay | Penokee, KS 67659 | $44,142 |
16 | Thomas F Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $43,736 |
17 | Minium Living Trust | Morland, KS 67650 | $43,432 |
18 | Richard L Roberts | Hill City, KS 67642 | $42,743 |
19 | Rtc Farms LLC | Norton, KS 67654 | $41,362 |
20 | Griffith Farms | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $40,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>