Conservation Reserve Program in Sherman County, Kansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 923

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sherman County, Kansas totaled $43,499,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
1Silkman IncWichita, KS 67226$893,067
2Joseph Scheopner Rev TrustGoodland, KS 67735$859,592
3Trifecta Farms IncLakin, KS 67860$822,700
4Richard - Richard L L BillingerGoodland, KS 67735$772,612
5Tim JaegerWichita, KS 67219$564,278
6Rita - Rita Mae Bill M BillingerGoodland, KS 67735$510,973
7P And M Land CorpMinden, NE 68959$501,212
8Tulip Farms IncLeoti, KS 67861$494,283
9Dennis Lee ShankGoodland, KS 67735$487,551
10Lois D Cossman Rev TrustGoodland, KS 67735$465,915
11Jim & Janice E Flanders TrustEdson, KS 67733$465,303
12Charles A Ihrig TrustGoodland, KS 67735$453,309
13Lloyd R Harden TrustGoodland, KS 67735$406,437
14Five Points Farms IncWichita, KS 67219$405,855
15Stanley Gordon PettiboneKanorado, KS 67741$403,680
16James L Hotovec TrustLoveland, CO 80537$402,920
17Leonard - Leonard M M NelsonArvada, CO 80004$355,420
18Sheryl Y JaegerWichita, KS 67219$347,948
19Nelson Family Limited PartnershipSaint Louis, MO 63131$343,323
20John Hollister Golden TrustGoodland, KS 67735$333,876

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag