Farm Subsidy information
Maryland
Total Subsidies in Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,897
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maryland totaled $78,716,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quantico Creek Sod Farms Inc | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $525,978 |
| 2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $417,224 |
| 3 | Harborview Farms | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $335,539 |
| 4 | Kilby Farms LLC | Colora, MD 21917 | $289,809 |
| 5 | Oak Bluff Farms LLC | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $280,185 |
| 6 | Moon Nurseries, Inc. | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $261,526 |
| 7 | James Nelson Farms Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $260,225 |
| 8 | Eric Lawrence Hignutt | Henderson, MD 21640 | $251,855 |
| 9 | Catoctin Mtn Growers Inc | Keymar, MD 21757 | $250,000 |
| 10 | Jvw Investments LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $250,000 |
| 11 | Fred R Moore & Son Inc | Eden, MD 21822 | $227,374 |
| 12 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $217,402 |
| 13 | Baugher Enterprises Inc | Westminster, MD 21158 | $214,923 |
| 14 | Clear Meadow Farm Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $214,140 |
| 15 | Sowers Farm Holdings LLC | Middletown, MD 21769 | $213,090 |
| 16 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $188,148 |
| 17 | Oakwood Sod Farm Inc | Delmar, MD 21875 | $182,540 |
| 18 | Fair Hill Farms Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $174,679 |
| 19 | Panora Acres Inc | Manchester, MD 21102 | $168,629 |
| 20 | Oakland View Farms LLC | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $168,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf