Total Commodity Programs in Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,135
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Maryland totaled $40,780,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Quantico Creek Sod Farms Inc | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $525,978 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $387,140 |
3 | Harborview Farms | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $298,571 |
4 | Kilby Farms LLC | Colora, MD 21917 | $289,809 |
5 | Oak Bluff Farms LLC | Woodsboro, MD 21798 | $272,503 |
6 | Moon Nurseries, Inc. | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $261,526 |
7 | Catoctin Mtn Growers Inc | Keymar, MD 21757 | $250,000 |
8 | Jvw Investments LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $250,000 |
9 | Fred R Moore & Son Inc | Eden, MD 21822 | $227,374 |
10 | Baugher Enterprises Inc | Westminster, MD 21158 | $214,923 |
11 | Clear Meadow Farm Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $214,140 |
12 | Sowers Farm Holdings LLC | Middletown, MD 21769 | $213,090 |
13 | James Nelson Farms Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $196,315 |
14 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $188,148 |
15 | Oakwood Sod Farm Inc | Delmar, MD 21875 | $182,540 |
16 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $173,516 |
17 | Oakland View Farms LLC | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $168,274 |
18 | P Thomas Mason | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $164,229 |
19 | Panora Acres Inc | Manchester, MD 21102 | $164,176 |
20 | Clearbell Farms LLC | Clear Spring, MD 21722 | $159,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>