Total Conservation Programs in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 242
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $1,449,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Anne R Windsor | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $50,000 |
2 | Derby Farm Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $50,000 |
3 | Dickinson Brothers | Linkwood, MD 21835 | $49,842 |
4 | Curtis Eberspacher | Cornelius, NC 28031 | $49,796 |
5 | Fairfield Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $40,311 |
6 | James F Mills | Kennesaw, GA 30144 | $39,205 |
7 | Goldsborough James Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $34,484 |
8 | D Mark Eberspacher | East New Market, MD 21631 | $31,476 |
9 | George B Asplen | Reisterstown, MD 21136 | $28,886 |
10 | Mary C Nabb | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $26,599 |
11 | John P Thomas | East New Market, MD 21631 | $25,801 |
12 | Harold Travers | Madison, MD 21648 | $23,945 |
13 | Philip Spedden Sr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $21,989 |
14 | Handleys Adventure | Vienna, MD 21869 | $20,670 |
15 | Greenbrier Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $19,690 |
16 | Lingan Spicer-lingan T Spicer Rev | Church Creek, MD 21622 | $18,331 |
17 | Lazy Day Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $16,236 |
18 | Robert Alan Lawson | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $14,007 |
19 | Philip Bye | Washington, DC 20015 | $13,956 |
20 | Spocott Forestry Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $13,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>