Conservation Reserve Program in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 437

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $23,220,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Richard E JonesPocomoke City, MD 21851$874,390
2Richard EvansBerlin, MD 21811$542,669
3Emily Jean TaylorPocomoke City, MD 21851$504,630
4Roger L RichardsonEden, MD 21822$487,468
5William E Davis SrSnow Hill, MD 21863$474,014
6Thomas J Johnson IIISnow Hill, MD 21863$470,425
7H Watson Powell SrNewark, MD 21841$387,217
8Emma Elizabeth Rickards Irrevocable TrustDagsboro, DE 19939$383,268
9Kenneth W OlandSnow Hill, MD 21863$355,035
10Rural Integrity Land LLCStockton, MD 21864$340,336
11Sandra Y FrazierDanville, CA 94526$324,058
12Virginia D EastPocomoke City, MD 21851$302,415
13Winifred RileyBerlin, MD 21811$265,475
14Charles R Jenkins Irrevocable TruOcean City, MD 21843$238,244
15Mason Family LLCNewark, MD 21841$236,887
16Richard L Gordy IncNewark, MD 21841$236,290
17A & J Family Limited PartnershipSiler City, NC 27344$213,419
18Estate Of Richard E JonesColumbia, MD 21045$209,838
19Charles E OverholtPocomoke City, MD 21851$202,495
20Gerald T ReddenGirdletree, MD 21829$202,302

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag