Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Massachusetts, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,645

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Massachusetts totaled $33,089,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Chang & Sons Enterprises IncS Deerfield, MA 01373$580,726
2Full Bloom Market Garden LLCSouth Deerfield, MA 01373$425,729
3Olson Greenhouses IncRaynham, MA 02767$365,155
4Pioneer Gardens IncDeerfield, MA 01342$355,944
5Plainville FarmHadley, MA 01035$334,232
6Meadow View Farms LLCSouthwick, MA 01077$323,788
7Bigelow Nurseries IncNorthborough, MA 01532$305,250
8Szawlowski Potato Farms IncHatfield, MA 01038$298,424
9King Farm IncTownsend, MA 01469$281,031
10Liberty Family Farms Inc.Ludlow, MA 01056$250,230
11Nourse Farms IncS Deerfield, MA 01373$250,000
12Savage Farms IncDeerfield, MA 01342$250,000
13Patterson Farm LLCSunderland, MA 01375$250,000
14Kanes Flower World IncDanvers, MA 01923$250,000
15Cape Cod Oyster Co IncMarstons Mills, MA 02648$248,264
16J P Bartlett Co IncSudbury, MA 01776$246,120
17Berry's Greenhouses, Inc.Medway, MA 02053$239,587
18Mahoney's Growing Co. LLCWinchester, MA 01890$239,196
19Pine Island Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$221,152
20J M Pasiecnik Farms LLCSouth Deerfield, MA 01373$217,623

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag