Total Commodity Programs in Leelanau County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 292
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $7,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cherry Bay Orchards Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $611,739 |
2 | Noonan & Sons | Maple City, MI 49664 | $479,292 |
3 | Keith E Parker | Cedar, MI 49621 | $333,735 |
4 | Terry Lautner | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $307,286 |
5 | Thomas Shimek | Empire, MI 49630 | $177,565 |
6 | Clarence Stachnik Jr | Cedar, MI 49621 | $154,067 |
7 | Schaubs Dairy Farms | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $140,987 |
8 | Gregory Brothers Farms LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $140,108 |
9 | Weaver Family Limited Partnership | Northport, MI 49670 | $135,285 |
10 | Svf Inc | Northport, MI 49670 | $133,561 |
11 | Donald Bugai | Cedar, MI 49621 | $120,653 |
12 | Olsen Farms | Maple City, MI 49664 | $119,658 |
13 | Send & Emeott LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $113,315 |
14 | Kolarik Brothers Farm | Northport, MI 49670 | $110,655 |
15 | Cherry Home Orchards LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $100,224 |
16 | Denis L Garvin | Cedar, MI 49621 | $94,730 |
17 | Stanek Brothers | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $91,769 |
18 | Dale Fritz | Empire, MI 49630 | $86,514 |
19 | Williams Orchards Dba | Cedar, MI 49621 | $80,161 |
20 | Jerry Kelenske | Cedar, MI 49621 | $79,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>