Total Commodity Programs in Carver County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 433
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Carver County, Minnesota totaled $14,042,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Barfnecht Farm LLC | Watertown, MN 55388 | $527,236 |
2 | Halquist Farms Inc | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $516,321 |
3 | Meuleners Farms Grain Partnership | Young America, MN 55397 | $507,904 |
4 | Dreier Farm LLC | Nya, MN 55368 | $398,275 |
5 | Jay Eichner | Hamburg, MN 55339 | $302,393 |
6 | Robert A Kloth | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55368 | $245,275 |
7 | Dennis John Otto | Norwood, MN 55368 | $243,741 |
8 | Karen Ann Otto | Norwood, MN 55368 | $243,691 |
9 | Lorraine Boelke | Cologne, MN 55322 | $242,289 |
10 | Buetow Farms Inc | Cologne, MN 55322 | $229,046 |
11 | Dulaine Farms Llp | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55397 | $203,771 |
12 | Dose Farms LLC | Hamburg, MN 55339 | $200,087 |
13 | Feltmann Dairy Farms LLC | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55368 | $197,952 |
14 | Olson Agronomics | Cologne, MN 55322 | $195,154 |
15 | Wolter Farms Llp | Norwood, MN 55368 | $193,206 |
16 | Lueth Farms LLC | Norwood Young Americ, MN 55397 | $185,857 |
17 | Neaton Farms | Watertown, MN 55388 | $180,910 |
18 | Paul J Rogers | Cologne, MN 55322 | $178,231 |
19 | Hoese Dairy Inc | Mayer, MN 55360 | $176,091 |
20 | James J Hausladen | New Germany, MN 55367 | $171,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>