Dairy Programs in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 383
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $14,249,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shea Dairy Inc | Viola, MN 55934 | $552,933 |
2 | Hidden Hill Dairy LLC | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $515,773 |
3 | Hinckley Holsteins LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $482,046 |
4 | Donald Logan Thompson | Plainview, MN 55964 | $467,536 |
5 | Jeffery Allen Kitzman | Elgin, MN 55932 | $348,443 |
6 | Edward Michael Twohey | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $339,010 |
7 | Charles J Sachs Jr | Eyota, MN 55934 | $332,551 |
8 | Blue Horizon Farm Fam Ltd Ptr | Rochester, MN 55906 | $330,664 |
9 | Borst Family Dairy LLC | Rochester, MN 55904 | $323,975 |
10 | North Creek Dairy LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $299,673 |
11 | Thomas A Berg | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $278,761 |
12 | Matthew Andring | Dover, MN 55929 | $268,901 |
13 | Danny Siem | Rochester, MN 55906 | $257,803 |
14 | Darrell Luhmann | Rochester, MN 55904 | $251,035 |
15 | Johnny Kahn | Rochester, MN 55906 | $247,788 |
16 | Blue Horizon Farm | Rochester, MN 55906 | $201,128 |
17 | Borst Family Farms | Rochester, MN 55904 | $198,066 |
18 | Terra Mccree Holsteins LLC | Rochester, MN 55902 | $197,777 |
19 | Gar-lin Dairy, LLC | Eyota, MN 55934 | $188,272 |
20 | Gary A Hoffman | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $177,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>