Total Commodity Programs in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 702
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $11,354,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ferrier Farms | Dover, MN 55929 | $211,093 |
2 | Robert Anthony Schimek | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $205,733 |
3 | Schoenfelder Farms | Rochester, MN 55904 | $183,150 |
4 | R C & A Hart Farms | Elgin, MN 55932 | $159,103 |
5 | Gls - Miller Joint Venture | Eyota, MN 55934 | $147,177 |
6 | Bourquin Farms Inc | Rochester, MN 55902 | $146,196 |
7 | Tiedemann Farms North LLC | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $128,959 |
8 | Steven Vermilya | Dover, MN 55929 | $120,816 |
9 | G-flowing Springs Farms Gen Ptshp | Eyota, MN 55934 | $120,653 |
10 | Shea Dairy Inc | Viola, MN 55934 | $115,001 |
11 | Daley Farms Llp | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $110,082 |
12 | Paul Allen Wendt | Eyota, MN 55934 | $108,485 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $108,252 |
14 | James Vermilya | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $108,166 |
15 | Gar-lin Dairy, LLC | Eyota, MN 55934 | $106,171 |
16 | Dale William Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $100,050 |
17 | Klassen Farms | St Charles, MN 55972 | $97,804 |
18 | John E Opfer | Byron, MN 55920 | $94,309 |
19 | Matthew Dale Hinckley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $93,892 |
20 | Eldon Wilbur Malwitz | Elgin, MN 55932 | $90,572 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>