Loan Deficiency in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 816
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $31,709,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $447,785 |
| 2 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $360,892 |
| 3 | Howard David Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $292,577 |
| 4 | Lundquist Bros | Janesville, MN 56048 | $286,932 |
| 5 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $274,094 |
| 6 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $271,255 |
| 7 | Dan Lyndon Roemhildt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $247,555 |
| 8 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $240,914 |
| 9 | James Craig Eaton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $219,540 |
| 10 | Troy Steven Schue | New Richland, MN 56072 | $218,074 |
| 11 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $217,893 |
| 12 | Merrill Mansfield Dahle | Waseca, MN 56093 | $215,658 |
| 13 | Neil Robert Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $206,932 |
| 14 | Terry Dean Hansen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $206,435 |
| 15 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $202,004 |
| 16 | David John Schultz | Janesville, MN 56048 | $200,371 |
| 17 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $200,036 |
| 18 | Richard Lee Guse | Waseca, MN 56093 | $197,265 |
| 19 | Marvin Gene Guse | Janesville, MN 56048 | $196,896 |
| 20 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $195,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
