Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Watonwan County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 398
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Watonwan County, Minnesota totaled $4,477,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wolle Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $105,023 |
2 | Downs Family Farms Lllp | Mankato, MN 56001 | $69,353 |
3 | Bottem Farms Inc | Saint James, MN 56081 | $63,522 |
4 | Keith James Greier | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $45,627 |
5 | Gary Dannhoff | Mankato, MN 56001 | $45,437 |
6 | David Pettersen | Madelia, MN 56062 | $44,749 |
7 | Geistfeld Bros Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $44,158 |
8 | Matthew J Wolle | Saint James, MN 56081 | $42,734 |
9 | William Kunz | Madelia, MN 56062 | $42,296 |
10 | Ryan Brandts | Saint James, MN 56081 | $41,103 |
11 | James Freeman Hoppe | Saint James, MN 56081 | $40,928 |
12 | Darla Jean Hoppe | Saint James, MN 56081 | $40,928 |
13 | Gregory Dean Romsdahl | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $38,395 |
14 | Stephen Dale Romsdahl | Saint James, MN 56081 | $38,371 |
15 | Todd R Reihs | Madelia, MN 56062 | $38,292 |
16 | Robert Reihs | Madelia, MN 56062 | $36,781 |
17 | Brudelie Farms LLC | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $36,744 |
18 | Dennis Coleman | Saint James, MN 56081 | $36,378 |
19 | James Hopman | Madelia, MN 56062 | $36,372 |
20 | Jeffrey Maloney | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $35,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>